<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Permament guest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lexia-3</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/comment-page-1/#comment-1995</link>
		<dc:creator>lexia-3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/?p=710#comment-1995</guid>
		<description>Your weblog appears pretty informative. I liked it. So a awesome offer very helpful material. I look at with awesome interest.Can you please inform me how can I look at your rss blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your weblog appears pretty informative. I liked it. So a awesome offer very helpful material. I look at with awesome interest.Can you please inform me how can I look at your rss blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Shrider</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/comment-page-1/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Shrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/?p=710#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>You made fantastic nice points here. I performed a search on the issue and discovered almost all peoples will agree with your blog. Crib toys are often interactive toys that keep baby amused when they wake up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made fantastic nice points here. I performed a search on the issue and discovered almost all peoples will agree with your blog. Crib toys are often interactive toys that keep baby amused when they wake up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phylladee</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/comment-page-1/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>phylladee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/?p=710#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>It really is hard to see that M, Isn&#039;t it? For some reason this reminds me of permafrost. And if you are splitting HAIRS, how big are they? Less than a **** hair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is hard to see that M, Isn&#8217;t it? For some reason this reminds me of permafrost. And if you are splitting HAIRS, how big are they? Less than a **** hair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chi</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/comment-page-1/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/?p=710#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>splitting hares? :p..............hair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>splitting hares? :p&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..hair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKTB FFS</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>MKTB FFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/?p=710#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Firstly, &quot;grotesquely ugly&quot; must surely be tautology.  No need.  Secondly, other than the dreadful spelling, this sign is not the worst example of idiocy, particularly as there&#039;s nothing intrinsically wrong with &quot;permanent guest(s)&quot;.  You&#039;re just splitting hares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, &#8220;grotesquely ugly&#8221; must surely be tautology.  No need.  Secondly, other than the dreadful spelling, this sign is not the worst example of idiocy, particularly as there&#8217;s nothing intrinsically wrong with &#8220;permanent guest(s)&#8221;.  You&#8217;re just splitting hares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/?p=710#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re wrong, and you&#039;re a grotesquely ugly freak. The very purpose of guest ales is that they are not permanent and you get variety, intrigue, novelty, and sometimes weird &#039;eggy smells&#039;. Ergo in this context it leans towards an oxymoron. Obviously the sign is correct in trying to say that they offer six guest ales on a permanent basis, but the phrasing is clumsy. I enjoy it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re wrong, and you&#8217;re a grotesquely ugly freak. The very purpose of guest ales is that they are not permanent and you get variety, intrigue, novelty, and sometimes weird &#8216;eggy smells&#8217;. Ergo in this context it leans towards an oxymoron. Obviously the sign is correct in trying to say that they offer six guest ales on a permanent basis, but the phrasing is clumsy. I enjoy it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKTB FFS</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2009/09/permament-guest/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>MKTB FFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/?p=710#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that &quot;permanent guest&quot; is an oxymoron.  Guest doesn&#039;t imply impermanence to me.  Wasn&#039;t Partridge a permananet guest at the Travel Tavern (AKA his &quot;sordid little hell hole&quot;)?  Wasnt the Major a permanent guest at Fawlty Towers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;permanent guest&#8221; is an oxymoron.  Guest doesn&#8217;t imply impermanence to me.  Wasn&#8217;t Partridge a permananet guest at the Travel Tavern (AKA his &#8220;sordid little hell hole&#8221;)?  Wasnt the Major a permanent guest at Fawlty Towers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

