<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sparkel Partys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>The one thing even more annoying than the mistakes on this sign is their inconsistency. Both &quot;partys&quot; and &quot;parties&quot; convey the same thing, yet somehow they haven&#039;t thought of this and eliminated one. I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing even more annoying than the mistakes on this sign is their inconsistency. Both &#8220;partys&#8221; and &#8220;parties&#8221; convey the same thing, yet somehow they haven&#8217;t thought of this and eliminated one. I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/#comment-886</guid>
		<description>I was relieved to find out that &quot;Nicki who is fully CRB checked who is a qualified stylist and beautician brought everything imaginable with her, to make any little girls dream come true.&quot;

Whew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was relieved to find out that &#8220;Nicki who is fully CRB checked who is a qualified stylist and beautician brought everything imaginable with her, to make any little girls dream come true.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim maguire</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>tim maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/#comment-883</guid>
		<description>I love how almost everything they got wrong they got right somewhere else in the same ad.

&quot;perfect for girls who liked to be glamours&quot;

What about the ones who still like to be glamours? Out of luck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how almost everything they got wrong they got right somewhere else in the same ad.</p>
<p>&#8220;perfect for girls who liked to be glamours&#8221;</p>
<p>What about the ones who still like to be glamours? Out of luck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/#comment-882</guid>
		<description>I particularly enjoyed this part of their website:  

dedicated to making every girls ‘make-over’ dreams a reality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particularly enjoyed this part of their website:  </p>
<p>dedicated to making every girls ‘make-over’ dreams a reality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/#comment-881</guid>
		<description>Did you miss the &quot;party extra&#039;s&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you miss the &#8220;party extra&#8217;s&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/comment-page-1/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/12/sparkel-partys/#comment-880</guid>
		<description>A quick glance at their (pretty awful) website didn&#039;t reveal any glaring errors there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick glance at their (pretty awful) website didn&#8217;t reveal any glaring errors there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

