<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &amp; Improved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-857</guid>
		<description>Apologies - my ironic titling was a rather abstruse reference to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/quandary-new-improved-recipe/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this old post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies &#8211; my ironic titling was a rather abstruse reference to <a href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/quandary-new-improved-recipe/">this old post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azure</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Azure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-856</guid>
		<description>Interesting title, seeing as how if something is improved, it&#039;s an improvement on something old, and if the something is new, then it cannot have been improved upon.
It should be one or the other--not both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting title, seeing as how if something is improved, it&#8217;s an improvement on something old, and if the something is new, then it cannot have been improved upon.<br />
It should be one or the other&#8211;not both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Thanks Arjewtino; a ringing endorsement if I ever saw one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Arjewtino; a ringing endorsement if I ever saw one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjewtino</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjewtino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Very nice.  You&#039;re all classy and shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice.  You&#8217;re all classy and shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

