<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#038; Improved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-857</guid>
		<description>Apologies - my ironic titling was a rather abstruse reference to &lt;a href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/quandary-new-improved-recipe/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this old post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies - my ironic titling was a rather abstruse reference to <a href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/quandary-new-improved-recipe/" rel="nofollow">this old post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azure</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Azure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-856</guid>
		<description>Interesting title, seeing as how if something is improved, it's an improvement on something old, and if the something is new, then it cannot have been improved upon.
It should be one or the other--not both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting title, seeing as how if something is improved, it&#8217;s an improvement on something old, and if the something is new, then it cannot have been improved upon.<br />
It should be one or the other&#8211;not both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Thanks Arjewtino; a ringing endorsement if I ever saw one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Arjewtino; a ringing endorsement if I ever saw one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjewtino</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/11/new-and-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjewtino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=314#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Very nice.  You're all classy and shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice.  You&#8217;re all classy and shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
