<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guilty Secrets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=180#comment-744</guid>
		<description>The less/fewer distinction is one of my personal pet peeves, but I'm not sure why.  I was recently delighted to see, at my local supermarket, that the "10 items or less" lane had become the "10 items or fewer" lane.  It's catching on! We're winning the war!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The less/fewer distinction is one of my personal pet peeves, but I&#8217;m not sure why.  I was recently delighted to see, at my local supermarket, that the &#8220;10 items or less&#8221; lane had become the &#8220;10 items or fewer&#8221; lane.  It&#8217;s catching on! We&#8217;re winning the war!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=180#comment-716</guid>
		<description>but what about ending sentences in prepositions?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;"These guilty secrets are either mistakes that I have to take real care to avoid or perceived errors that I don't see any wrong in."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what about ending sentences in prepositions?</p>
<p>&#8220;These guilty secrets are either mistakes that I have to take real care to avoid or perceived errors that I don&#8217;t see any wrong in.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goofy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>goofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=180#comment-603</guid>
		<description>1000 years of English usage support your use of "less" with count nouns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1000 years of English usage support your use of &#8220;less&#8221; with count nouns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantolwen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantolwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=180#comment-595</guid>
		<description>I think Lynn Truss turned me into a stickler.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have to admit that I never notice the misuse of less and fewer. I make this mistake all the time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But if something becomes such common standard usage (like 'their' etc. for he/she), then doesn't that mean it's become normal English and you're allowed to say/write it? Most people use less instead of fewer these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Lynn Truss turned me into a stickler.</p>
<p>I have to admit that I never notice the misuse of less and fewer. I make this mistake all the time.</p>
<p>But if something becomes such common standard usage (like &#8216;their&#8217; etc. for he/she), then doesn&#8217;t that mean it&#8217;s become normal English and you&#8217;re allowed to say/write it? Most people use less instead of fewer these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty red pen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty red pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=180#comment-594</guid>
		<description>I confess: I frequently write "it's" when I mean "its." &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, I and about three hundred years of writing history support your use of the singular their. For Pete's sake, even Jane Austen used it. How long does a thing have to be in common usage before it becomes common usage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess: I frequently write &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; when I mean &#8220;its.&#8221; </p>
<p>Also, I and about three hundred years of writing history support your use of the singular their. For Pete&#8217;s sake, even Jane Austen used it. How long does a thing have to be in common usage before it becomes common usage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=180#comment-593</guid>
		<description>I can sympathise with you - I like to think I'm quite good when it comes to grammar, and yet I find myself not even caring whether it's "less" or "fewer"! I also agree completely on the use of they/their when the gender of a person is not known. I don't care what Microsoft Office thinks of it! I definitely think there comes a point where you have to go with what sounds less stupid, rather than what is technically correct.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you're interested, collective nouns such as sports teams and governing bodies are referred to as a singular in French as well. And since you have genders for them, you effectively refer to a football team as "she" if it is the subject of a sentence, for example, whereas in English I would always say "they". Perhaps it is an example of a grammar rule which has mutated in the UK, but remained in its original form since the settlers arrived in America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can sympathise with you - I like to think I&#8217;m quite good when it comes to grammar, and yet I find myself not even caring whether it&#8217;s &#8220;less&#8221; or &#8220;fewer&#8221;! I also agree completely on the use of they/their when the gender of a person is not known. I don&#8217;t care what Microsoft Office thinks of it! I definitely think there comes a point where you have to go with what sounds less stupid, rather than what is technically correct.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested, collective nouns such as sports teams and governing bodies are referred to as a singular in French as well. And since you have genders for them, you effectively refer to a football team as &#8220;she&#8221; if it is the subject of a sentence, for example, whereas in English I would always say &#8220;they&#8221;. Perhaps it is an example of a grammar rule which has mutated in the UK, but remained in its original form since the settlers arrived in America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/04/guilty-secrets/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=180#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Don't forget you also fail to punctuate your txt msgs. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Terry Wogan is a big fan of literally pulling people up (by their hair, usually) when it comes to being 'sat' rather than sitting. Of course, it can sometimes be correct to say you were sat somewhere, e.g. on those occasions when you have genuinely been placed in position by someone else. But I rarely see this happen, except when I'm sat on buses home after midnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget you also fail to punctuate your txt msgs. </p>
<p>Terry Wogan is a big fan of literally pulling people up (by their hair, usually) when it comes to being &#8217;sat&#8217; rather than sitting. Of course, it can sometimes be correct to say you were sat somewhere, e.g. on those occasions when you have genuinely been placed in position by someone else. But I rarely see this happen, except when I&#8217;m sat on buses home after midnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
