<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I don&#8217;t want e-mail anymore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty red pen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty red pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-536</guid>
		<description>I lost this argument when revising the styleguide at my job and we stuck with e-mail (but did change from Web site to website).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For what it&#039;s worth, Bill Walsh asserts in &quot;Lapsing into a Comma&quot; that &quot;No initial-based term in the history of the English language has ever evolved to form a solid word--a few are split and the rest are hyphenated&quot; eg: A-frame, B-movie, H-bomb, K car, X-ray and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lost this argument when revising the styleguide at my job and we stuck with e-mail (but did change from Web site to website).For what it&#8217;s worth, Bill Walsh asserts in &#8220;Lapsing into a Comma&#8221; that &#8220;No initial-based term in the history of the English language has ever evolved to form a solid word&#8211;a few are split and the rest are hyphenated&#8221; eg: A-frame, B-movie, H-bomb, K car, X-ray and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autumn</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Autumn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-532</guid>
		<description>I like &quot;email.&quot; I think the word has been used enough to qualify for promotion to the non-hyphen category--it&#039;s easily recognizable without the hyphen, and I don&#039;t think it loses any clarity. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But the trouble begins when people see &quot;email&quot; and think those pesky hyphens are finally a thing of the past, and start jamming all sorts of words together willy-nilly. Or willynilly, as it were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like &#8220;email.&#8221; I think the word has been used enough to qualify for promotion to the non-hyphen category&#8211;it&#8217;s easily recognizable without the hyphen, and I don&#8217;t think it loses any clarity. But the trouble begins when people see &#8220;email&#8221; and think those pesky hyphens are finally a thing of the past, and start jamming all sorts of words together willy-nilly. Or willynilly, as it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpmason</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>rpmason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-529</guid>
		<description>AP says that e-mail &quot;...is also the preference of many newspapers.&quot; Isn&#039;t that rather circular logic? Many newspapers use the AP Stylebook as their primary style guide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AP says that e-mail &#8220;&#8230;is also the preference of many newspapers.&#8221; Isn&#8217;t that rather circular logic? Many newspapers use the AP Stylebook as their primary style guide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-528</guid>
		<description>House style on the magazine I work for is &#039;e-mail&#039;, but my own personal preference is &#039;email&#039;. This leaves me terminally confused and no doubt somewhat inconsistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House style on the magazine I work for is &#8216;e-mail&#8217;, but my own personal preference is &#8216;email&#8217;. This leaves me terminally confused and no doubt somewhat inconsistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauldwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>pauldwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I was strongly against “email” for a long time, because I didn’t think there was any precedent in English for pronouncing it “eeemail” instead of “emmail”. Then I remembered “emu”, and I’m sure there are others.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I personally prefer “e-mail”, but I don’t bristle at “email”. I think Strunk and White notes that many words that have been joined with hyphens have ended up merged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was strongly against “email” for a long time, because I didn’t think there was any precedent in English for pronouncing it “eeemail” instead of “emmail”. Then I remembered “emu”, and I’m sure there are others.I personally prefer “e-mail”, but I don’t bristle at “email”. I think Strunk and White notes that many words that have been joined with hyphens have ended up merged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Wrong site; correct observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong site; correct observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Oops. I&#039;m not on the SPOGG site. I don&#039;t know what I was thinking with the &quot;Martha.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. I&#8217;m not on the SPOGG site. I don&#8217;t know what I was thinking with the &#8220;Martha.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Martha, it wasn&#039;t Oxford English Dictionary that dropped so many hyphens, it was the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. They are different books with different editorial policies, different editorial teams, different update cycles, and divergent content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha, it wasn&#8217;t Oxford English Dictionary that dropped so many hyphens, it was the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. They are different books with different editorial policies, different editorial teams, different update cycles, and divergent content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2008/02/i-dont-want-e-mail-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=157#comment-520</guid>
		<description>I agree the hyphen should be dropped. Of e-book, e-commerce, e-shopping and e-business, I only see e-commerce in wide usage. The argument for consistency is a weak one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the hyphen should be dropped. Of e-book, e-commerce, e-shopping and e-business, I only see e-commerce in wide usage. The argument for consistency is a weak one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

