<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m FYIing this FYI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/12/im-fyiing-this-fyi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/12/im-fyiing-this-fyi/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/12/im-fyiing-this-fyi/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=130#comment-466</guid>
		<description>I think the point here is that, regardless of what is believed, forwarding an email shouldn&#039;t be seen as an endorsement of the email&#039;s content. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Actually the main point is the ridiculous verbing of F.Y.I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point here is that, regardless of what is believed, forwarding an email shouldn&#8217;t be seen as an endorsement of the email&#8217;s content. Actually the main point is the ridiculous verbing of F.Y.I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantolwen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/12/im-fyiing-this-fyi/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantolwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=130#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Creationists are sacked for endorsing creation (or even for just being a creationist), so I don&#039;t see why evolutionists shouldn&#039;t have the same rules applied to them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I could go on about this forever, but I&#039;ve seen both sides as I used to believe in evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creationists are sacked for endorsing creation (or even for just being a creationist), so I don&#8217;t see why evolutionists shouldn&#8217;t have the same rules applied to them.I could go on about this forever, but I&#8217;ve seen both sides as I used to believe in evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

