<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Me, myself and I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-722</guid>
		<description>I know this is a really old post, I just happened across it today and thought I&#039;d add my question in case someone *is* looking for new comments.  In the initial example, the writer stated that &quot;this is I...&quot; would be incorrect.  I didn&#039;t think it actually was.  I seem to remember being taught that after a linking verb a subject pronoun is used, rather than an object pronoun.  I know my mother always answered &quot;This is she&quot; when a phone caller asked for her by name.  Is there such an exception or not??  The reason I was given for this rule is that &quot;is&quot; (and other conjugations as well) implies equivalence of the subject and object.  (this is she &lt;=&gt; she is this)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a really old post, I just happened across it today and thought I&#8217;d add my question in case someone *is* looking for new comments.  In the initial example, the writer stated that &#8220;this is I&#8230;&#8221; would be incorrect.  I didn&#8217;t think it actually was.  I seem to remember being taught that after a linking verb a subject pronoun is used, rather than an object pronoun.  I know my mother always answered &#8220;This is she&#8221; when a phone caller asked for her by name.  Is there such an exception or not??  The reason I was given for this rule is that &#8220;is&#8221; (and other conjugations as well) implies equivalence of the subject and object.  (this is she  she is this)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty red pen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty red pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-360</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;*Well done for spotting my deliberate mistake, MRP. Good to know you are paying attention.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You know I hang on GrammarBlog&#039;s every word, doncha?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>*Well done for spotting my deliberate mistake, MRP. Good to know you are paying attention.</i>You know I hang on GrammarBlog&#8217;s every word, doncha?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty red pen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty red pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Gez, I feel compelled to mention, only because it&#039;s such a great typo, that his name is really Paul Brians, although he probably does have a lot of Brains . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gez, I feel compelled to mention, only because it&#8217;s such a great typo, that his name is really Paul Brians, although he probably does have a lot of Brains . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmadler</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>cmadler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Setting the grammar issue aside, I have always preferred captioning photos in third person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting the grammar issue aside, I have always preferred captioning photos in third person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-336</guid>
		<description>That wasn&#039;t a reprimand, that was a joshing. Everyone should read the engine room, it&#039;s great. You can find the link in our friend list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That wasn&#8217;t a reprimand, that was a joshing. Everyone should read the engine room, it&#8217;s great. You can find the link in our friend list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-335</guid>
		<description>I have been officially reprimanded for over-zealously promoting my blog on GrammarBlog! Fear not, I shall cease and desist.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But I will, of course, continue commenting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been officially reprimanded for over-zealously promoting my blog on GrammarBlog! Fear not, I shall cease and desist.But I will, of course, continue commenting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Punctuating quotations: there seems to be a big difference between US and UK usage. Americans seem to be sticklers for including punctuation within the quote marks, whereas Brits don&#039;t unless the punctuation itself is part of the quote. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is bit of a generalisation I know but it is my experience having taught English as a foreign language working both with other Brits and Americans.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It may be that  usage in the UK is changing to match the American model (which would be a shame).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Incidentally, I work for a UK magazine and we don&#039;t include punctuation inside our quote marks unless it is part of the quote - so it is not so rebellious as you might think!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Umm, I was going to write about &#039;me&#039; and &#039;I&#039; but got sidetracked... maybe next time...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://engineroomblog.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Punctuating quotations: there seems to be a big difference between US and UK usage. Americans seem to be sticklers for including punctuation within the quote marks, whereas Brits don&#8217;t unless the punctuation itself is part of the quote. This is bit of a generalisation I know but it is my experience having taught English as a foreign language working both with other Brits and Americans.It may be that  usage in the UK is changing to match the American model (which would be a shame).Incidentally, I work for a UK magazine and we don&#8217;t include punctuation inside our quote marks unless it is part of the quote &#8211; so it is not so rebellious as you might think!Umm, I was going to write about &#8216;me&#8217; and &#8216;I&#8217; but got sidetracked&#8230; maybe next time&#8230;<a href="http://engineroomblog.blogspot.com">http://engineroomblog.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-333</guid>
		<description>I agree with Gez (and Bill Bryson). Punctuating quotations which fall at the end of sentences is a bit of a minefield that no-one has ever set a proper rule for - establish your own preference and stick to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Gez (and Bill Bryson). Punctuating quotations which fall at the end of sentences is a bit of a minefield that no-one has ever set a proper rule for &#8211; establish your own preference and stick to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-332</guid>
		<description>You rebel, you! Actually, I think we&#039;ve covered this in a comment thread of a previous post (which I can&#039;t, for the life of me, find). The rule isn&#039;t as set in stone as you think. As you are quoting a complete sentence, you could end it ...game.&quot;. but that just looks weird. As long as you are consistent with your style, nobody can complain too much about ahow you choose to deal with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You rebel, you! Actually, I think we&#8217;ve covered this in a comment thread of a previous post (which I can&#8217;t, for the life of me, find). The rule isn&#8217;t as set in stone as you think. As you are quoting a complete sentence, you could end it &#8230;game.&#8221;. but that just looks weird. As long as you are consistent with your style, nobody can complain too much about ahow you choose to deal with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave33</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/11/me-myself-and-i/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=97#comment-331</guid>
		<description>One of the main factors in the incorrect usage of &quot;I&quot; and &quot;me&quot; is due to an overcorrection of using &quot;me&quot; as a subjective pronoun, as in &quot;John and me went to the game&quot;. Then it was drilled into all of us that it was &quot;John and I&quot; and now everyone thinks that is the only correct usage. So now you&#039;ll routinely hear people, especially tv journalists use &quot;I&quot; where &quot;me&quot; should be used, not because they think it sounds informal but because they&#039;ve been overcorrected.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Note: I know I incorrectly placed the period outside of the quote in my first sentence. I personally rebel against the rule that punctuation should be inside quotes when ending sentences. The quoted passage is just a chunk of the main sentence and the punctuation is ending the main sentence not the chunk. I think that rule should be changed! ;) I&#039;d love to hear what other people think about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the main factors in the incorrect usage of &#8220;I&#8221; and &#8220;me&#8221; is due to an overcorrection of using &#8220;me&#8221; as a subjective pronoun, as in &#8220;John and me went to the game&#8221;. Then it was drilled into all of us that it was &#8220;John and I&#8221; and now everyone thinks that is the only correct usage. So now you&#8217;ll routinely hear people, especially tv journalists use &#8220;I&#8221; where &#8220;me&#8221; should be used, not because they think it sounds informal but because they&#8217;ve been overcorrected.Note: I know I incorrectly placed the period outside of the quote in my first sentence. I personally rebel against the rule that punctuation should be inside quotes when ending sentences. The quoted passage is just a chunk of the main sentence and the punctuation is ending the main sentence not the chunk. I think that rule should be changed! <img src='http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;d love to hear what other people think about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

