<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open till midnight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/open-till-midnight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/open-till-midnight/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/open-till-midnight/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=87#comment-294</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re both right, a bit of research on my part wouldn&#039;t go amiss in future. My (belated) investigation leads me to believe that &lt;i&gt;till&lt;/i&gt; is old English and I can&#039;t help but think it would have gone the way of &lt;i&gt;thou&lt;/i&gt; if not for its similarity to &lt;i&gt;&#039;til&lt;/i&gt;. Know that I am suitably embarrassed. I considered taking the post down but think it should stand here as a warning to other rash, ignorant bloggers too lazy to research their posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re both right, a bit of research on my part wouldn&#8217;t go amiss in future. My (belated) investigation leads me to believe that <i>till</i> is old English and I can&#8217;t help but think it would have gone the way of <i>thou</i> if not for its similarity to <i>&#8217;til</i>. Know that I am suitably embarrassed. I considered taking the post down but think it should stand here as a warning to other rash, ignorant bloggers too lazy to research their posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/open-till-midnight/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=87#comment-293</guid>
		<description>I do think you should know that you&#039;re mistaken on this one. &quot;Till&quot; is a longstanding conjunction and preposition with a life of its own. It&#039;s also older than &quot;until&quot; and is not a misspelled abbreviation of &quot;until.&quot; So, it&#039;s perfectly acceptable to use, although, because of mistaken ideas about its validity, it&#039;s probably best avoided where one has a point to make that might be lost in a usage kerfluffle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think you should know that you&#8217;re mistaken on this one. &#8220;Till&#8221; is a longstanding conjunction and preposition with a life of its own. It&#8217;s also older than &#8220;until&#8221; and is not a misspelled abbreviation of &#8220;until.&#8221; So, it&#8217;s perfectly acceptable to use, although, because of mistaken ideas about its validity, it&#8217;s probably best avoided where one has a point to make that might be lost in a usage kerfluffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/10/open-till-midnight/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=87#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Webster&#039;s Collegiate says &quot;till&quot; means &quot;until,&quot; and Chicago Manual of Style says, &quot;This is a perfectly good preposition and conjunction...It is not a contraction of &quot;until&quot; and should not be written &quot;&#039;til.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webster&#8217;s Collegiate says &#8220;till&#8221; means &#8220;until,&#8221; and Chicago Manual of Style says, &#8220;This is a perfectly good preposition and conjunction&#8230;It is not a contraction of &#8220;until&#8221; and should not be written &#8220;&#8217;til.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

