<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s not easy being a grammar wizard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris cross</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>chris cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>this is some great stuff love it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is some great stuff love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammar Monster</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammar Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>If you’re going to be snotty about someone’s grammar, at least have the decency to get your own right.

For being a grammar web site (WHAT? SPEAK PLAIN ENGLISH, MAN), you really don’t know how to use commas. I see comma splices rife throughout your blog. They should be semicolons (SHOULD THEY? THE BEST WAY TO FIX A COMMA SPLICE IS TO START A NEW SENTENCE. SEMICOLONS ARE OVERUSED.) Anyway, if this weren’t a grammar web site, I wouldn’t really care, but it was funny to see (CHILDISH VERBAGE). Maybe, if you (WOULD!) be so kind as to look over your comma/semicolon misusage (&lt; IS THAT A WORD), you can (COULD – CONDITIONAL!) rectify the problem. It’s a word to the wise I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’re going to be snotty about someone’s grammar, at least have the decency to get your own right.</p>
<p>For being a grammar web site (WHAT? SPEAK PLAIN ENGLISH, MAN), you really don’t know how to use commas. I see comma splices rife throughout your blog. They should be semicolons (SHOULD THEY? THE BEST WAY TO FIX A COMMA SPLICE IS TO START A NEW SENTENCE. SEMICOLONS ARE OVERUSED.) Anyway, if this weren’t a grammar web site, I wouldn’t really care, but it was funny to see (CHILDISH VERBAGE). Maybe, if you (WOULD!) be so kind as to look over your comma/semicolon misusage (&lt; IS THAT A WORD), you can (COULD – CONDITIONAL!) rectify the problem. It’s a word to the wise I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexnander</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexnander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>Stephen, I hope your post was a joke: &quot;Between you and I,&quot; object pronouns always go after prepositions, so it should be: &#039;between you and me,&#039; (me being the first person singular object).  Irregardless, this &#039;word&#039; contains both a suffix, and a prefix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, I hope your post was a joke: &#8220;Between you and I,&#8221; object pronouns always go after prepositions, so it should be: &#8216;between you and me,&#8217; (me being the first person singular object).  Irregardless, this &#8216;word&#8217; contains both a suffix, and a prefix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>The kids scragged the teacher because --  like most prescriptivists -- he was forever breaking his own silly &quot;rules&quot;.

Between you and I, guys, I have a variety of pet peeves that I&#039;d like to conservate about with you. One is about all the people on the Net who have never cracked a linguistics textbook in their lives, but yet who go ahead, irregardless, and set themselves up as &quot;grammar&quot; experts. 

Of course alot of the time -- nearly always, actually -- they harp on endlessly about matters of no importance whatsoever. Misplaced apostrophes and other misspellings (that are often just typos anyway)are particularly popular for some reason. 

Another thing that brasses me off is those Americans (it&#039;s an American obsession in particular) who keep complaining about &quot;comma splices&quot;. The finest writers have all used comma splices since the year dot, and will go on using them. It&#039;s a non-rule that scarcely makes more sense than the non-rule about never ending sentences with prepositions.

And did I see someone somewhere talk about &quot;genitives&quot; in English...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kids scragged the teacher because &#8212;  like most prescriptivists &#8212; he was forever breaking his own silly &#8220;rules&#8221;.</p>
<p>Between you and I, guys, I have a variety of pet peeves that I&#8217;d like to conservate about with you. One is about all the people on the Net who have never cracked a linguistics textbook in their lives, but yet who go ahead, irregardless, and set themselves up as &#8220;grammar&#8221; experts. </p>
<p>Of course alot of the time &#8212; nearly always, actually &#8212; they harp on endlessly about matters of no importance whatsoever. Misplaced apostrophes and other misspellings (that are often just typos anyway)are particularly popular for some reason. </p>
<p>Another thing that brasses me off is those Americans (it&#8217;s an American obsession in particular) who keep complaining about &#8220;comma splices&#8221;. The finest writers have all used comma splices since the year dot, and will go on using them. It&#8217;s a non-rule that scarcely makes more sense than the non-rule about never ending sentences with prepositions.</p>
<p>And did I see someone somewhere talk about &#8220;genitives&#8221; in English&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>That line from Chris Radant should read, &quot;Thanks for the effort to keep English in ITS rightful place.&quot;  It should not be IT&#039;S.  So much for keeping it in its rightful place! HAHAHA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That line from Chris Radant should read, &#8220;Thanks for the effort to keep English in ITS rightful place.&#8221;  It should not be IT&#8217;S.  So much for keeping it in its rightful place! HAHAHA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>For being a grammar web site, you really don&#039;t know how to use commas.  I see comma splices rife throughout your blog.  They should be semicolons.  Anyway, if this weren&#039;t a grammar web site, I wouldn&#039;t really care, but it was funny to see.  Maybe, if you be so kind as to look over your comma/semicolon misusage, you can rectify the problem.  It&#039;s a word to the wise I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For being a grammar web site, you really don&#8217;t know how to use commas.  I see comma splices rife throughout your blog.  They should be semicolons.  Anyway, if this weren&#8217;t a grammar web site, I wouldn&#8217;t really care, but it was funny to see.  Maybe, if you be so kind as to look over your comma/semicolon misusage, you can rectify the problem.  It&#8217;s a word to the wise I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Radant</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Radant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Perfect English certainly should be preserved and I bow to you for keeping up the fight!

                               AND

It would be impossible for me to write humor without breaking the rules. For instance, I write a series of &quot;Wickedpedia&quot; A guy from Southie explains everthin. Drives spell-checker crazy.

Thanks for the effort to keep English in it&#039;s rightful place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect English certainly should be preserved and I bow to you for keeping up the fight!</p>
<p>                               AND</p>
<p>It would be impossible for me to write humor without breaking the rules. For instance, I write a series of &#8220;Wickedpedia&#8221; A guy from Southie explains everthin. Drives spell-checker crazy.</p>
<p>Thanks for the effort to keep English in it&#8217;s rightful place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/08/its-not-easy-being-a-grammar-wizard-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 02:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/blog/?p=273#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>I totally agree! 

:) Elizabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree! </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

