<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This blog will take you a short two minutes to read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/06/this-blog-will-take-you-a-short-two-minutes-to-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/06/this-blog-will-take-you-a-short-two-minutes-to-read/</link>
	<description>A blog about spelling, punctuation and grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goofy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/06/this-blog-will-take-you-a-short-two-minutes-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>goofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=24#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Maybe, but it is grammatical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, but it is grammatical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gez</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/06/this-blog-will-take-you-a-short-two-minutes-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Gez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=24#comment-498</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not very elegant though, is it? As best it&#039;s clumsy; at worst it&#039;s redundant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not very elegant though, is it? As best it&#8217;s clumsy; at worst it&#8217;s redundant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goofy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/06/this-blog-will-take-you-a-short-two-minutes-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>goofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=24#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I drove to the corner store yesterday but the traffic was really bad. It was a long ten-minute drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drove to the corner store yesterday but the traffic was really bad. It was a long ten-minute drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goofy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/06/this-blog-will-take-you-a-short-two-minutes-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>goofy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=24#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Most adjective+noun combinations are ambiguous between an intersective and appositive meaning. Clearly &quot;a short ten-minute drive&quot; means &quot;a ten-minute drive, which is short&quot;, and on that appositive reading there&#039;s nothing wrong with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most adjective+noun combinations are ambiguous between an intersective and appositive meaning. Clearly &#8220;a short ten-minute drive&#8221; means &#8220;a ten-minute drive, which is short&#8221;, and on that appositive reading there&#8217;s nothing wrong with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/2007/06/this-blog-will-take-you-a-short-two-minutes-to-read/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.38.103.143/~grammarb/blog/?p=24#comment-50</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a classic weekend in terms of &lt;em&gt;reportage&lt;/em&gt;. I enjoyed Gavin Esler&#039;s new Sunday slot (I think it&#039;s on BBC News 24), which - as far as I can be bothered to tell - seems to be some sort of &#039;London&#039; &#039;magazine&#039; &#039;show&#039;. Terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a classic weekend in terms of <em>reportage</em>. I enjoyed Gavin Esler&#8217;s new Sunday slot (I think it&#8217;s on BBC News 24), which &#8211; as far as I can be bothered to tell &#8211; seems to be some sort of &#8216;London&#8217; &#8216;magazine&#8217; &#8216;show&#8217;. Terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

